Scarlett Johansson’s Chilling Performance in ‘Under the Skin’—Why This Sci-Fi Film Is Still Haunting Audiences

In 2013, director Jonathan Glazer’s Under the Skin premiered as an unsettling exploration of human nature, alienation, and gender. Starring Scarlett Johansson in an uncharacteristic role, the film followed an extraterrestrial being in disguise as a woman, roaming the streets of Scotland and luring unsuspecting men to their doom. The film’s haunting atmosphere, coupled with Johansson’s nuanced performance, has made it a point of fascination in cinema history, despite its initial commercial failure.

Under the Skin wasn’t just another science fiction film; it was an audacious piece of art that challenged traditional narrative structures. Johansson, known for her roles in more mainstream films, portrayed an alien character in a manner that is both chilling and vulnerable. Her performance, which oscillates between being a cold, predatory figure and a lost, confused soul, marked a departure from her typical roles, showcasing a depth of emotion rarely seen in her other work. Critics praised her ability to evoke empathy while embodying a character whose very nature is foreign to human experience.

Despite the praise for Johansson’s performance and Glazer’s visionary direction, Under the Skin struggled at the box office, grossing a mere $7 million worldwide, far below its $13.3 million production budget. The film received critical acclaim, boasting an impressive 83% on Rotten Tomatoes and a strong 4 out of 5 stars from Allociné. However, audience reception was more tepid, with a 55% approval rating on Rotten Tomatoes and a modest 2.7 out of 5 on Allociné. The disconnect between critical and audience reception can largely be attributed to the film’s unconventional style and minimalistic approach, which may have alienated viewers expecting a more traditional sci-fi experience.

A defining element of Under the Skin is its haunting, minimalist soundtrack by Mica Levi, which plays a pivotal role in shaping the film’s eerie atmosphere. The music amplifies the surrealism of the visuals, creating a sense of dislocation that mirrors the alien nature of Johansson’s character. The soundtrack, which eschews typical orchestral arrangements in favor of unsettling, electronic compositions, has become as much of a talking point as the film’s striking visuals. The sparse dialogue and reliance on imagery instead of exposition elevate the emotional and philosophical undercurrents, providing a visceral experience for those willing to engage with its abstract storytelling.

One of the film’s most compelling aspects is its thematic depth. Under the Skin tackles profound questions about gender, humanity, and desire, offering a critique of objectification and exploitation, particularly in the context of female identity. The film uses its alien protagonist to examine the human experience from a cold, detached perspective, exploring the commodification of the human body and the complexities of intimacy and connection. These themes have only gained relevance in the years since its release, sparking discussions on the portrayal of women in cinema and the implications of identity and autonomy.

Though Under the Skin may have faltered at the box office, it has since earned a place as a significant work of experimental cinema. Filmmakers such as Jordan Peele, director of Get Out and Us, have cited the film as a major influence on their own work. Peele acknowledged the film’s unique aesthetic and how it inspired his approach to blending horror with social commentary. This recognition from peers reflects the film’s lasting impact, even if it didn’t initially find a wide audience.

As the years have passed, Under the Skin has become a touchstone for those interested in experimental cinema and the potential of science fiction to explore complex emotional and philosophical terrain. Its slow-burn narrative, stark visuals, and chilling sound design continue to intrigue new viewers, sparking debates about its meaning and relevance in today’s cultural landscape.

While the film didn’t enjoy commercial success upon release, Under the Skin has proven its value in the long term. It remains a vital work in the ongoing conversation about the evolution of cinema and the boundaries of storytelling. Johansson’s ethereal performance and Glazer’s distinct vision have left a mark on the cinematic world, one that will continue to resonate for years to come. Revisiting this film invites critical reflection on its themes and the future of experimental cinema, underscoring the enduring importance of artistic integrity in film.